Seven weeks into Gaza’s ceasefire, significant disagreements exist between Washington and European capitals regarding post-conflict plans. This divide could jeopardize not only Gaza’s humanitarian situation but also the credibility of Western coordination on global crises.
The Trump administration’s 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) has upset the longstanding transatlantic consensus, alarming nations like Germany and Poland while appealing to Russia. The 33-page document frames European integration as a threat to civilization and emphasizes “patriotic” nationalism, undermining NATO’s ideological foundations even as member countries reach record defense spending levels.
American foreign policy towards India illustrates that punitive measures against key partners often result in the opposite of intended outcomes. During Putin’s ceremonial visit to India in December 2025, Washington faced the uncomfortable truth that its economic coercion was reinforcing the relationships it aims to weaken.
Emmanuel Macron’s December visit to Beijing signified a strategic shift for France, aiming to convert trade deficits into investment chances while addressing European security issues. The trip highlighted key tensions in European-Chinese relations, with Brussels calling for economic rebalancing and Beijing desiring unrestricted market access amidst rising transatlantic trade disputes.
Israeli and European Jewish leadership often misunderstand EU foreign policy by perceiving it as influenced by individual personalities rather than institutional frameworks. This misinterpretation hinders strategic engagement and diminishes diplomatic effectiveness for both sides.
The December 5, 2025 release of the Trump administration’s National Security Strategy signifies a significant shift in transatlantic relations, explicitly showcasing American antagonism toward its historical democratic allies. The document goes beyond conventional policy disputes, exposing a deep-seated hostility toward European sovereignty, democratic governance, and territorial integrity.
The election of Catherine Connolly as the 10th President of Ireland in October 2025 marks a significant change in Dublin’s foreign policy, moving from critical neutrality to perceived hostility towards Israel. Connolly’s characterization of Hamas as integral to Palestinian society indicates a substantial shift in the Irish electorate’s geopolitical stance, creating notable diplomatic challenges for both Jerusalem and Brussels.
As Europe supports Ukraine, three other post-Soviet states remain dangerously exposed to Russian coercion and aggression. Russian efforts to destabilize these states are already underway, raising a significant challenge for European decisionmakers.
Countries have come to rely on a network of cables and pipes under the sea for their energy and communications. A coordinated attack on this network could have devastating consequences. But that is difficult business in a very challenging environment.
The analysis examines post-WWII order shifts and Trump’s NATO impact: U.S. pressure for higher European defense spending could strengthen cooperation or weaken transatlantic ties. The alliance’s future hinges on Europe’s response and mutual strategic choices.
The article analyzes shifts in GOP foreign policy and Trump’s impact on NATO. Trump’s transactional approach pushes Europe to boost defense spending, but risks weakening transatlantic unity. Success depends on turning pressure into stronger cooperation, not European strategic divergence from the U.S.
Ukraine’s battlefield innovations in drones, AI, and electronic warfare offer the US a critical preview of future conflict. Partnering with Ukraine now could help modernize America’s defense and avoid strategic lag.
