Information Warfare – think tanks monitor

A collage featuring flags, news headlines from BBC and Reuters, and contrasting imagery of civilians and soldiers to illustrate media framing.

How Western Media Language Became a Weapon in the Iran War

June 8, 2026

This analysis explores how linguistic choices in mainstream Western media have constructed a specific narrative around the US-Israel military campaign against Iran. By examining the shift from passive-voice framing for airstrikes to active-voice descriptions of Iranian responses, the article illustrates how clinical euphemisms—such as “decapitation strikes”—obscure the legal and humanitarian realities of the conflict. The post argues that existing international relations vocabulary is ill-equipped to describe the doctrine of permanent preemption, calling for more rigorous analytical frameworks that challenge state-led narratives rather than merely repeating them.

A person waving a Russian flag in front of Saint Basil's Cathedral in Moscow.

The West Keeps Predicting Russia’s Collapse and Keeps Getting It Wrong

June 3, 2026

This analysis examines the persistent failure of Western analytical frameworks to accurately predict Russia’s stability. By examining the impact of the “knowledge iron curtain” that has severed direct research ties, the structural biases within exiled opposition discourse, and the ideological blind spots regarding authoritarian functionality, we argue that the “collapse narrative” is actively distorting Western policy. This report challenges the assumption that Russia’s ongoing economic and military stresses must inevitably lead to systemic breakdown, urging a shift toward empirical observation and a more nuanced understanding of how Moscow continues to adapt under pressure.

An Israeli military official in uniform standing in an office in front of a world map.

Israel’s Military PR Machine Is Breaking Down Where It Matters Most

May 30, 2026

This article examines the breakdown of the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit under Brigadier General Effie Defrin. By analyzing the decline in military transparency, the misuse of media controls, and the shift in international public opinion, we assess how retreating from difficult truths is undermining the credibility of Israel’s strategic communications.

Closing America’s Gray Zone Confidence Gap

May 12, 2026

Strategic competition today is defined by influence operations and narrative battles, yet American decision-making remains plagued by institutional overconfidence. Lessons from Afghanistan highlight a failure to track analytical accuracy, suggesting that the U.S. must invest in “decision infrastructure” and forecasting systems to turn intelligence into a durable advantage.

A composite image featuring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the left and military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov on the right, with the Mother Ukraine monument in Kyiv and the Ukrainian flag in the background.

Budanov’s Rise and the Kremlin’s Coup Narrative: What’s Real in Kyiv

April 28, 2026

The appointment of Kyrylo Budanov to head Ukraine’s Presidential Office has sparked Russian claims of an impending coup. However, the move is more likely a calculated effort by President Zelensky to neutralize a popular political rival and bolster his administration’s wartime credibility following high-level corruption scandals and domestic pressure.

A crying Lego figure representing a US official in front of the White House with miniature soldiers in the background.

Iran Gains Edge in Online Battle Over US Conflict

April 16, 2026

A new digital frontline has emerged as Iran leverages AI-powered satire and viral content to challenge the U.S. narrative. While Washington’s messaging faces domestic criticism for its tone, Tehran’s creative use of humor and social media has effectively reached global audiences, highlighting the growing power of asymmetric information warfare.

Thick smoke billowing from an industrial oil refinery facility after an attack or explosion.

Calling Iran “Animals” Didn’t Win the War, It Helped Lose It

April 14, 2026

The recent conflict highlights how dehumanizing rhetoric and strategic contempt toward Iran resulted in significant military and intelligence failures. By dismissing the adversary’s scientific capacity and strategic depth, policymakers built a strategy on fiction, ultimately leading to a costly stalemate that failed to achieve its primary geopolitical objectives.

An open Persian children's storybook featuring an illustration of a group of birds attacking an elephant.

What Iran Teaches Its Children and Why Washington Never Listened

April 10, 2026

Understanding Iran’s wartime behavior requires looking at its classrooms, not just its missile silos. For decades, Iran’s national curriculum has fused Islamic values with ancient Persian resilience, teaching generations that collective resistance against a “superior elephant” is the only moral response. Washington’s failure to grasp this cultural foundation explains why 40 days of strikes have consolidated national identity instead of fracturing it, as the “sparrow vs. crocodile” mindset remains the heart of Tehran’s asymmetric doctrine.

Thick black smoke rising from industrial oil storage tanks near a port facility.

US is Using Clone Drones for False Flag Attacks on Gulf States

March 17, 2026

Iran claims the U.S. and Israel are staging false‑flag attacks on Gulf states using LUCAS drones — an American system modeled on the Shahed. The allegation, unverified but strategically potent, aims to sow doubt among Gulf partners already shaken by the war and to fracture Washington’s fragile regional alignment.

Digital screen showing an Israeli flag with a red "X" through it and ISNAD branding for cyber warfare.

ISNAD’s Shift From Wartime Propaganda to Long-Term Social Warfare

February 24, 2026

The ISNAD network has shifted from wartime agitation to long‑term influence operations, using fake Hebrew accounts to erode Israeli social cohesion. Its new “sociological warfare” strategy promotes polarization, distrust, and emigration. With tighter organization and ideological volunteers, ISNAD offers a replicable model of civilian‑style interference that democracies are still struggling to counter.

Several crew members wearing gas masks operating a complex control panel filled with buttons, dials, and digital displays in a smoky, dimly lit room.

Machine-Generated Misinformation and Nuclear Security: Artificial Intelligence Risks in Early Warning Systems

December 30, 2025

AI integration in nuclear early warning systems creates catastrophic risks by generating high-fidelity “hallucinations” and deepfakes that could trigger accidental escalation. To ensure strategic stability, nuclear powers must maintain strict “human-in-the-loop” protocols, improve deepfake detection, and prioritize information accuracy over launch speed in crisis decision-making.

Featured

Gaza Needs an International Peacekeeping Force Now

Topics

Featured

Europe Is Pursuing Strategic Autonomy — But Not Without America Yet

Middle East

Asia

America

Europe

Africa

Cartoon

Video

Podcast

Tag: Information Warfare

How Western Media Language Became a Weapon in the Iran War

The West Keeps Predicting Russia’s Collapse and Keeps Getting It Wrong

Israel’s Military PR Machine Is Breaking Down Where It Matters Most

Closing America’s Gray Zone Confidence Gap

Budanov’s Rise and the Kremlin’s Coup Narrative: What’s Real in Kyiv

Iran Gains Edge in Online Battle Over US Conflict

Calling Iran “Animals” Didn’t Win the War, It Helped Lose It

US is Using Clone Drones for False Flag Attacks on Gulf States

Machine-Generated Misinformation and Nuclear Security: Artificial Intelligence Risks in Early Warning Systems

Regions

Subjects

Multimedia

Contact Info

Email