US-Backed Figures Risk Familiar Fate in Iran Crisis
A recurring pattern in American foreign policy—the cultivation of local proxies for regime change—is once again playing out in the Iran conflict. From exiled figures to ambitious local politicians, those seeking power through external sponsorship often ignore the cautionary tales of the past. History suggests that such collaborations are inherently fragile, frequently ending in isolation or abandonment once Washington’s strategic priorities shift.
Iran War Erodes US Appetite for Middle East Role
As the conflict enters its third month, domestic opposition to U.S. military engagement in the Middle East has reached a critical tipping point. Driven by rising energy costs and economic anxiety, a majority of Americans now disapprove of the ongoing campaign. With the 60-day War Powers Resolution deadline approaching, the administration faces a defiant Congress and a public increasingly weary of open-ended regional commitments.
Iran Conflict Strengthens Authoritarian Networks
The ongoing conflict with Iran has unveiled a sophisticated web of cooperation among authoritarian states. Beyond tactical military aid, China and Russia are helping Tehran build a parallel economic and technological system. From electronic warfare sharing to the normalization of non-dollar trade, this “Authoritarian Collaboration” is actively reshaping global alignments and challenging the resilience of democratic alliances.
EU Cybersecurity Rules Threaten China Trade Ties
Deepening tensions between the EU and China have reached a new flashpoint over proposed revisions to the European Cybersecurity Act. By introducing “non-technical” risk assessments, the EU moves toward potential exclusion of Chinese technology providers from critical infrastructure. This strategic shift faces fierce opposition from Beijing, which warns of severe disruptions to global trade, renewable energy goals, and the erosion of multilateral WTO principles.