India’s diplomatic approach to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan is influenced more by strategic calculations than ideological alignment. As Pakistan’s influence wanes and China’s presence increases, India seeks to maintain connectivity to Central Asia while refraining from legitimizing a government that opposes its democratic values.
The recent Trump-Xi summit at the APEC gathering in Busan has raised critical questions regarding regional security architecture, particularly with Washington’s announcement of a “G2” framework with Beijing, which may reshape the Indo-Pacific strategic landscape beyond bilateral trade negotiations.
The election of Catherine Connolly as the 10th President of Ireland in October 2025 marks a significant change in Dublin’s foreign policy, moving from critical neutrality to perceived hostility towards Israel. Connolly’s characterization of Hamas as integral to Palestinian society indicates a substantial shift in the Irish electorate’s geopolitical stance, creating notable diplomatic challenges for both Jerusalem and Brussels.
The adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2803 signifies a diplomatic win for the Trump administration, endorsing the “20-point plan” for Gaza. However, the initiative faces challenges due to major Arab powers’ refusal to participate in “peace enforcement” against Hamas, which may hinder the deployment of the authorized International Stabilization Force (ISF) aimed at securing the region.
Trump’s foreign policy echoes Nixon’s doctrine of delegating regional security to allies (like Israel in the Middle East) to reduce U.S. burdens. While this approach shows promise in the Middle East and Europe, it faces hurdles: loss of control over proxies, continued U.S. involvement needs, and outright failure in Asia—where China’s military dominance makes allied self-reliance impossible.
Israel’s limited war on Iran needs to be judged against the alternatives. By that measure, the operation was a success. Limited wars can buy time, shift the geopolitical dynamic and, in doing so, pave the way to something more enduring.
The article analyzes shifts in GOP foreign policy and Trump’s impact on NATO. Trump’s transactional approach pushes Europe to boost defense spending, but risks weakening transatlantic unity. Success depends on turning pressure into stronger cooperation, not European strategic divergence from the U.S.
There is no credible way for the United States to seal itself off from the effects of China’s actions.
Elections held in the first half of 2025 suggest that Trump’s victory and the way he has governed since have, on balance, hurt the right-wing nationalist movement around the world more than they helped.
COMMENTARY
The purpose and promise of China’s International Organization for Mediation
If IOMed proves to be effective, it will be a serious competitor to the existing international dispute settlement mechanisms.
COMMENTARY
What South Korea’s presidential election means for the US-Korea alliance
Some in Washington fear that a “quiet crisis“ may be brewing between Seoul and Washington.
An “interim” nuclear agreement between the United States and Iran seems likely, and would be a grave mistake for the United States.
