Why the “Regime Change” Agenda for Iran is an Illusion

The policy of “regime change” in Iran is often viewed in Washington as a viable option, yet it ignores the deep-seated historical grievances, a complex multi-centric governing system, and a resilient social fabric. Unlike smaller states, Iran’s vast geography and grassroots paramilitary networks, rooted in its unique political-religious identity, make external imposition of power a strategic impossibility.
New Warfare Between Iran and Israel: Phosphorus, Precision Strikes, and the Narrative War in February–March 2026

The February–March 2026 war marks a turning point in modern conflict, where kinetic firepower meets a sophisticated narrative war. From the massive 900-strike opening wave to the controversial use of white phosphorus in Yohmor and AI-generated propaganda, this article explores how the Iran-Israel dyad has redefined hybrid warfare in a hyper-mediated, multi-domain environment.
India’s Israel Policy: Caught between Strategic Partnership and Strategic Hedging?

India’s foreign policy is undergoing a profound recalibration, moving from a traditional anti-colonial stance to a pragmatic “Special Strategic Partnership” with Israel. While New Delhi continues to balance its critical energy and diaspora interests in the Gulf and its strategic ties with Iran, the recent elevation of the Israel partnership signals a shift toward prioritizing defense modernization and high-tech cooperation in an increasingly multipolar Middle East.
Trump’s Path to Stabilizing US-Iran Ceasefire

As the US-Iran ceasefire holds, the Trump administration faces a critical window to stabilize global energy markets and address domestic economic pressures. By prioritizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and coordinating with regional allies, Washington seeks to convert recent military leverage into a durable strategic settlement before the upcoming midterm elections.
Trump’s Iran Moves Accelerate Shift in Global Power

The recent US-Iran conflict has exposed the limitations of unilateral military pressure in a multipolar world. While a ceasefire holds, the rise of a new regional quartet—Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt—alongside China’s increasing diplomatic role, suggests a significant decline in traditional American dominance over Middle Eastern security dynamics.
To Lam Visit Deepens China-Vietnam Strategic Ties

Vietnamese President To Lam’s first overseas trip to Beijing signals a deepening strategic partnership with China. Facing global economic pressures, both nations are prioritizing high-level cooperation in trade, infrastructure, and renewable energy, aiming to balance regional stability with ambitious domestic modernization goals through 2026 and beyond.
South Caucasus Strengthens Role in Eurasian Trade Routes

Kazakhstan and its South Caucasus partners are rapidly modernizing the Middle Corridor to create a resilient Eurasian trade artery. With significant investments in Georgia’s Poti terminal and digital coordination with Azerbaijan, transit times from China have dropped to 11 days, positioning the region as a strategic alternative to traditional northern routes.
Sanctions Tool Faces Scrutiny Over Humanitarian Toll

A recent study reveals that unilateral sanctions contribute to over 564,000 excess deaths annually, disproportionately affecting children. Cases in Cuba and Iran demonstrate that while economic pressure aims for political shifts, it often results in severe humanitarian crises, infrastructure failure, and limited strategic success in the long term.
Russia’s Influence Fades Across Central Asia

Moscow’s influence across Central Asia is steadily eroding due to the economic strains of war and sanctions. Regional powers are now diversifying their strategic partnerships, prioritizing the Middle Corridor and Chinese investment over traditional Russian ties to secure long-term infrastructure, energy reliability, and economic independence in a multipolar landscape.
Calling Iran “Animals” Didn’t Win the War, It Helped Lose It

The recent conflict highlights how dehumanizing rhetoric and strategic contempt toward Iran resulted in significant military and intelligence failures. By dismissing the adversary’s scientific capacity and strategic depth, policymakers built a strategy on fiction, ultimately leading to a costly stalemate that failed to achieve its primary geopolitical objectives.