Congress’s long‑running surrender of oversight has left it unable to restrain Trump’s Iran war, as lawmakers who ceded power now watch an unauthorized conflict expand, deepen executive dominance, and set precedents future presidents will inherit.
China counters Trump’s pressure by sending humanitarian aid to Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, and Jordan, using relief diplomacy to project responsibility while avoiding U.S. demands for military help, as the collapsed Beijing summit underscores Washington’s isolation and Beijing’s strategy of patience, neutrality, and quiet leverage.
China faces its worst energy crisis in decades as the Hormuz shutdown slashes oil supplies, leaving Beijing unable to back the U.S., unwilling to abandon Iran, and scrambling for alternatives while the war exposes its strategic vulnerabilities and accelerates its push toward energy independence.
Allies refuse to join Trump’s war after years of insults and broken trust, leaving the U.S. isolated in a crisis he created and unable to rally partners who see no benefit in helping a president who never rewards loyalty.
Japan’s first female prime minister faces U.S. pressure to send minesweepers to Hormuz, trapped between constitutional limits, domestic opposition, and economic vulnerability as rising oil prices and shifting U.S. military focus leave Tokyo with no good options.
Trump’s strategy of hemispheric retreat, tariff coercion, and fossil‑fuel dominance is accelerating the very American decline it vowed to reverse. The U.S. has suffered a sharp drop in global soft power, alienated allies through chaotic tariffs, and ceded the clean‑energy future to China. The result is a faster, more chaotic erosion of U.S. influence.
Indonesia’s tariff deal with Washington risks unraveling its hard‑won nickel industrial policy. The agreement lifts U.S. levies but pressures Jakarta to relax export restrictions without securing binding processing or technology commitments. With China dominating refining and EV markets shifting away from nickel, the deal could weaken Indonesia’s leverage unless renegotiated.
Global trade is being squeezed between U.S. tariff volatility and China’s projection of stability. Trump’s rapid tariff shifts froze the EU’s Turnberry deal and rattled partners from India to ASEAN. Meanwhile, China’s record surplus masks weak domestic demand. For third countries, the real choice is between American policy whiplash and Chinese dependency.
The newest research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York confirms what every serious economist already knew: tariffs function as a domestic tax, and American households and businesses pay almost all of it. Between early 2024 and late 2025, roughly 90% of tariff costs stayed inside the United States, mirroring the pattern from the 2018–2019 trade war.
The global economy is now fully multipolar in production and consumption, yet its financial backbone still runs through a single national currency. That mismatch — a 21st‑century world running on 1944 plumbing — is what BRICS is trying to correct. Not by dethroning the dollar with the renminbi, but by building a neutral clearing system that avoids the trap of replacing one hegemon with another.
BRICS has evolved from a clever acronym into a geopolitical project large enough to unsettle Washington. Trump’s 2025 tariff threats — and the panic triggered by his Spain “BRICS” gaffe — reveal how seriously the U.S. now treats the bloc. With 20 members and partners, BRICS+ represents a demographic and economic mass that rivals the G7, even if its internal cohesion remains uneven.
