In January 2026, Beijing is navigating the chaos of the second Trump administration with a policy of “selective silence.” While the U.S. pursues high-visibility interventions in Venezuela, Greenland, and Iran, China has largely declined to engage in tit-for-tat escalation.
In January 2026, the diplomatic rift between the United States and the Kingdom of Denmark has escalated into a full-blown security crisis. The catalyst for this friction was the January 3rd capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela (Operation Absolute Resolve), which emboldened the Trump administration to pivot its “transactional realism” toward the Arctic.
In 2025, the “America First” foreign policy yielded a contradictory scorecard of five successes and five failures. While the administration successfully pivoted toward a more realistic National Security Strategy and engaged in pragmatic diplomacy with Russia, Belarus, and the Houthis, it simultaneously stumbled into escalatory patterns in Iran, Venezuela, and Syria.
The 2025 National Security Strategy marks a significant shift from longstanding American foreign policy by recognizing resource limitations and emphasizing geographical proximity rather than global intervention. This change, while controversial, aims to address the “insolvency” issue—highlighting the disconnect between national goals and the means to accomplish them.
