In early 2026, Washington’s “Sheriff of Capitalism” doctrine has formalised a shift from a rules-based global order to one defined by resource nationalism and coercive statecraft. This strategy was punctuated by the dramatic January 3, 2026, capture of Nicolás Maduro and the subsequent tariff war against European allies over the sovereignty of Greenland.
In early 2026, the Western Hemisphere is witnessing a seismic shift in geopolitical alignment. Driven by the December 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) and the implementation of the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine, Washington has re-prioritized the Americas as its primary strategic theater. This realignment focuses on three pillars: the exclusion of non-hemispheric powers (China and Russia), the securitization of migration and trade, and the direct use of “regime change” as a tool of stability.
This article examines how Latin America’s deep-seated integration into Chinese trade networks—exceeding $515 billion in 2024—overrides the region’s recent rightward political shifts. Using case studies from Argentina’s soy exports to Brazil’s response to U.S. tariffs, it argues that economic pragmatism and the “commercial logic of resource extraction” remain more influential than ideological alignment with Washington.
This analysis details how global actors are countering unpredictable U.S. trade policies through “accelerated pursuit of alternative partnerships” and financial diversification. It highlights the shift toward conventional multilateral agreements (like the EU-India and Canada-China deals) and the steady decline of the dollar’s share in global reserves—falling from 72% in 2000 to 56.9% by 2025—as nations hedge against geopolitical risk.
This analysis argues that American unipolarity is collapsing not due to external rivals, but because the U.S. has traded “strategic restraint” for “zero-sum extraction.” By dismantling the self-binding institutional order that once made its leadership attractive, the U.S. has forced allies to seek alternative, more volatile multipolar arrangements.
In January 2026, the trade map of Eurasia reflects a stark reality: despite being hundreds of kilometers closer to the Central Asian Republics (CARs), Pakistan’s ports are frequently bypassed for Iranian alternatives. While geography favors Pakistan, operational reliability and security stability have solidified Iran’s position as the preferred gateway.
In early 2026, the Middle East has entered what analysts describe as a state of “Exhausted Realignment.” Following the kinetic “12-Day War” between Israel and Iran in June 2025 and the fall of the Assad regime in Syria in December 2024, the region is now caught between a “Maximum Pressure 2.0” campaign from Washington and a desperate diplomatic “hedging” strategy by the Gulf states.
As the Trump administration revives the Monroe Doctrine to pressure Caracas, Beijing’s influence in Latin America faces a critical test. Despite condemning U.S. “bullying,” China’s response remains purely symbolic, revealing its unwillingness to militarily defend Venezuela and highlighting the stark reality of American hegemony in the Western Hemisphere.
Three key geopolitical events in 2025 have shifted Europe’s role from an aspiring strategic player to a subordinate partner reliant on external powers. The military defeat in Ukraine, technological dependence on China, and economic capitulation to the United States expose deep structural vulnerabilities that years of integration did not resolve, resulting in Europe’s reduced influence amid increasing global competition.
